Tag trends

Businesses Are Realizing That Snapchat Isn’t Going to Disappear Anytime Soon

Photo credit: Marco Verch on Flickr.For a while now, marketers have debated about whether or not it is a good idea to use Snapchat to market a brand’s products or services.

However, in recent months, the app that is known for its disappearing content seems to have more vocal fans than detractors.

At the very least, more brands are experimenting with it.

The obvious reason for this is the fact that more and more people have started using the app.

In fact, according to a post on the comScore blog written by Adam Lella, “Snapchat isn’t just for teens and college-age adults anymore. While still wildly popular among these younger demographic segments, the ephemeral photo and video sharing app is also rapidly growing its user base among older Millennials (Age 25-34) and those 35 years-and-older. Three years ago, Snapchat’s app was only being used by 5% of smartphone users age 25-34 and 2% of users age 35+, according to comScore Mobile Metrix. Today its penetration among these two age demos is an impressive 38% and 14%, respectively.”

What is maybe more impressive is the fact that 69% of smartphone users age 18-24 use Snapchat.

“Snapchat’s growth has likely been fueled by the introduction of several popular product features over the past few years, which amplified its already powerful network effects,” the author of the comScore post explains. “Most notable among those new product features was the launch of “Stories”, which allows a user’s “snaps” (i.e. photos or videos) to be viewed in a chronological order by their friends an unlimited number of times in a 24-hour period. The Stories feed also includes coverage of various live events or places, in which some of the best snaps from users engaging with that showcased event are curated into one story available to all users. And more recently, Snapchat began regularly adding innovative ways to express oneself, such as “Lenses,” the camera’s creative filter options which make simple photos and videos more fun and entertaining.”

Knowing this, many marketers have started looking for ways to leverage the new Snapchat features to reach all of the customers and potential customers who use the app.

For businesses that are thinking about using Snapchat, here are a few things to consider.

Snapchat Lenses and Geofilters

As Adam Lella pointed out in the comScore post, the fact that Snapchat gives users the option to make their content more fun by providing lenses and geofilters has helped fuel the growth of the app.

While similar, there is a slight difference between a Snapchat lens and a geofilter.

Lenses give users the ability to add real-time special effects and sounds to the user’s Snaps.

By now, you have probably seen the rainbows coming out of a person’s mouth or a person’s face morphed into a zombie. (President Obama used the zombie Snapchat lens in his 2016 White House correspondent’s dinner video.)

Several large brands have also used sponsored lenses to increase awareness of their products or services.

In fact, earlier this year, Taco Bell launched a sponsored lens to celebrate Cinco de Mayo that resulted in 224 million views in one day. According to Adweek, this “shattered a Snapchat record.”

According to the New York Times, a Snapchat lens like this could cost between $450,000 to $750,000. This puts sponsoring a lens out of reach for many businesses.

However, that doesn’t mean that smaller brands can’t get in on the fun.

Snapchat also has geofilters that businesses can purchase for considerably less.

Geofilters are basically digital graphics that can be put over the user’s Snaps to make the current photos or videos more interesting.

In addition to the free community geofilters and the filters that can add various stats like time, temperature, or the speed that a person is going, Snapchat also offers on-demand geofilters that can be purchased by businesses or even users themselves.

The Personal Geofilter can be used to promote weddings, parties, birthdays, graduations, or just about any other event that is tied to a physical location.

A Business Geofilter can be used to help promote sales or any other event that is taking place at the business.

According to a LA Times article, these geofilters can be purchased for as little as $5 depending on when and how large of an area you want to include.

This inexpensive price makes it possible for local bars and restaurants to experiment a little.

Snapchat Stories

As mentioned in the comScore article, the other feature that has helped fuel Snapchat’s growth is the introduction of Snapchat Stories.

Again, the Snapchat Stories feature lets friends view a user’s Snaps an unlimited number of times within a 24-hour period.

A lot of brands are using Snapchat Stories to give users a behind the scenes look at the business, offer an all-access view of an event, offer surprise coupons and discounts, or create an interesting story that connects with customers.

For example, Red Bull often lets influencers take over their account in order to let users see what it is like to live and compete in some of the extreme sports that fit the brand’s image.

Other brands like Express are using Snapchat to highlight some of the items that they have for sale and then ask for engagement with the brand. They then acknowledging those who do respond, which is a great way to make customers feel valued.

These are just a few suggestions. There are many different case studies to be found on the Internet.

Also, you need to understand that any brand can create Snapchat Stories, and these shouldn’t be confused with the content provided on Snapchat Discover.

Not Everyone Is a Fan of Snapchat

I started this post off by mentioning that there has been a debate going on about whether or not brands should invest in Snapchat.

And, while a lot of brands have started to at least experiment with Snapchat, others think that it is a waste of time. These people often list measurement issues among their largest concerns.

In a Forbes article, Mark Fidelman explains the concerns that he has with Snapchat.

Many of his complaints are similar to others I’ve heard before.

However, the one point that he makes that really hits home with me is the fact that when a person sees your content on Snapchat, there is no way to send them to your website or blog using a clickable link. This not only makes it difficult to drive sales, it also makes it difficult to attribute a conversion to Snapchat. And, the fact that there aren’t any links from the app means that your efforts won’t help with SEO at all.

Final Thoughts

There are definitely issues that make it difficult for some businesses to justify investing in Snapchat to market their products or services.

However, given the fact that a lot of people have started using the app, it might make sense to invest at least a part of your marketing spend on the app.

If done right, using Snapchat can be a fun way to connect with your current and potential customers.

In my opinion, this is an app that I would keep an eye on and try a few things, but it is not a place that I would invest a lot of time in. At least not now.

That said, I also don’t think that Snapchat is going disappear anytime soon.

It is just somewhat difficult for businesses to use Snapchat to market their products and services. And, it’s even more difficult to measure the results of these efforts.

This, however, might be part of the reason why so many people have started using Snapchat.

Photo credit: Marco Verch on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

Low- or No-Tech Solutions for Retail Loss Prevention

Photo credit: Alan Cleaver on Flickr.While the estimates vary by source, the fact is retailers lose a lot of money each year as a result of theft.

According to one source, United States retailers are losing $60 billion a year due to shrinkage. That is billion with a “B”.

This estimate was cited in a Forbes article and was based the US Retail Fraud Survey – 2015 from Retail Knowledge. According to this report, employee theft is the biggest problem. However, non-employee theft also contributes to the overall figure.

As many retailers are already aware, thieves are walking through their doors each and every day.

Knowing this, retailers need to find ways to mitigate their losses while maintaining a welcoming atmosphere for honest, law-abiding customers.

While not a comprehensive list, a few of the specific suggestions that experts provide are listed below.

Welcome to the Store – The Importance of a Store Greeter

It is not surprising that the first suggestion listed in the Forbes article mentioned above is to have an employee greet customers as they enter the store.

This is a practice that is common in many retail stores.

According to the authors of the Introduction to Criminal Justice: A Balanced Approach, Retail security experts have noted that this person is not just a greeter. He or she is in a position to prevent shoplifting. In particular, it is believed that the greeter sends a message to shoppers that they have been recognized and that if they think about stealing, someone has seen them in the store.”

With this in mind, it is not surprising that Walmart is bringing back greeters to combat their shrinkage problems.

Customer Service as a Way to Reduce Theft

As pointed out on Wikipedia, “The vast majority of thieves have one thing in common, they will steal only if they have the opportunity. So theft prevention is fairly easy. Constant and great customer service will eliminate most opportunity to steal.”

“80% of customers who steal merchandise are opportunists and do not walk in to the store with the intent to steal,” the contributor to Wikipedia states. “They find that one thing they did not expect to find, cannot afford to pay for it, and will steal it if they have the opportunity.”

Just Look at Yourself – Using Mirrors as a Way to Reduce Theft

As I pointed out in a post back in 2012, “Mirrors are important sales tools for retailers. Not only do they help people visualize how an item will look on them before they make the purchase, but strategically placed mirrors might also be an effective way to reduce theft by shoppers and employees, alike.

In the post, I cited information found in Brainfluence: 100 Ways to Persuade and Convince Consumers with Neuromarketing by Roger Dooley.

“When we look in a mirror, our behavior is actually altered – at least for a short period of time,” writes Dooley in the book.

Dooley supports this statement with past research that suggests that by seeing their own image, people are more likely to think about their behavior and act in a more socially desirable way.

Reducing Credit Card and Debit Card Fraud

In the Forbes article mentioned above, Paul Hunter, President and CEO of Sterling Payment Technologies, gives some tips to reduce credit card and debit card fraud.

“Be sure to check that the customer’s signature on the receipt matches the signature on the back of their card,” Hunter is quoted as saying. “This will verify that the cardholder is, in fact, the card owner. If there is no signature on their card, ask for ID. Additionally, ask for a customer’s ID if the amount of the transaction is larger than your average transaction size. This policy has already been implemented at many of our nation’s largest retailers. You should also implement payment solutions that include ‘point-to-point’ encryption in addition to EMV. Point-to-point encryption further reduces the possibility that card numbers can be determined if a transaction request is intercepted. Finally, when a customer’s card is processed through the card reader, make sure that last four digits of the card number that print on the receipt match the last four digits embossed on the front of the card. Some POS systems will prompt the cashier to re-enter those digits from the card to make sure they agree with the value obtained from the card reader.”

Final Thoughts

Theft is a huge problem for retailers in the United States.

Therefore, no matter whether they are large or small, retailers need to find ways to mitigate their losses while providing a shopping environment that is welcoming to their law-abiding customers.

There are some basic things that retailers can do to reduce theft.

As the examples listed in this post show, some of the most important things that retailers can do involve having employees available who provide great customer service.

This will not only help reduce shrinkage, but should also help the retailer achieve some of the other goals that they have, including the most important, selling more products.

Photo credit: Alan Cleaver on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

Added to the Watch List: Dynamic Pricing in Brick-and-Mortar Stores

Photo credit: Thomas Altfather Good on Flickr.Price, along with product, promotion, and place is one of the parts of marketing that E. Jerome McCarthy included on the list of four P’s that he used when he expanded on what Neil Borden coined as the “Marketing Mix.”

While it is a very important part of marketing, price is something that I just haven’t focused on.

However, a recent article written by Bryan Eisenberg has me extremely intrigued.

In the post, Eisenberg recommends that brick-and-mortar retailers find ways to innovate or be left behind.

But, it was one paragraph, in particular, that really got me thinking.

“Omni-channel retail needs new leaders with an entrepreneur’s vision to thrive amongst the chaos and jump ahead of the curve,” writes Eisenberg. “We need bold experimentation in the brick & mortar channel. It’s not enough to give your associates mobile devices to enable checkout from anywhere in the store. Apple has been doing that for years. Take a look at what jewelry retailer Blue Nile has done at first with their test kiosks and now with their first successful brick-and-mortar “web room.”  Have you seen Amazon’s first store? There are no prices on the shelves. They’ll leverage people’s own devices to offer dynamic pricing. Will you?”

It was the last part that jumped out at me.

While it might not seem like much to some people, if other stores follow Amazon’s lead, I think that we can look forward to some huge changes in how retailers price their products and services in order to compete with the stores around the corner and the ones customers have access to via their computers and mobile devices.

It’s Nothing New Online—But Could Be a Huge Deal in a Brick-and-Mortar Retail Store

According to Wikipedia, “Dynamic pricing, also referred to as surge pricing or demand pricing, is a pricing strategy in which businesses set flexible prices for products or services based on current market demands. Business are able to change prices based on algorithms that take into account competitor pricing, supply and demand, and other external factors in the market.”

“The concept of dynamic pricing has been around for many years, particularly in the airline and hotel industries, but retail is one of the newer industries to adopt this pricing strategy, and it’s growing rapidly,” the Wikipedia page points out. “Many believe dynamic pricing will become more relevant in the future of ecommerce.”

A 2012 Wall Street Journal article also points out some of the factors that online retailers use when setting prices online.

“It is difficult for online shoppers to know why, or even if, they are being offered different deals from other people,” the authors of the Wall Street Journal article write. “Many sites switch prices at lightning speed in response to competitors’ offerings and other factors, a practice known as “dynamic pricing.” Other sites test different prices but do so without regard to the buyer’s characteristics.”

In the example listed in the article, Staples.com used the distance that a person was located from a competitor’s brick-and-mortar store as one of the factors it used to adjust the prices for the items it sold online.

However, this is the online store where prices can be changed with only a few clicks.

Before smartphones, this type of change would have been extremely difficult in brick-and-mortar stores.

Sure, most retail stores have sales that change the prices of the items that they sell, maybe even daily.

And, they could offer coupons via the paper or even email to certain customers. So they do have the ability to target certain customers to entice them to buy by offering discounted prices.

But, the smartphone and the data that retailers now have can give them the ability to target customers and change prices with a much faster turnaround time, possibly even in real time.

This could be a game changer.

Final Thoughts

As I mentioned earlier, pricing strategy is not my area of expertise.

So, there isn’t much more that I can add to the discussion.

That said, it is easy to recognize that having the ability to determine if price will have an effect on a sale and make a price adjustment when a customer is most likely to buy from the store (i.e., when they are actually in the brick-and-mortar store) can and will have a huge impact on sales.

That’s why I plan to watch what retailers do and monitor advancements in the technologies that they use to adjust prices that they offer to customers online and in brick-and-mortar stores using the data collected from customers’ smartphones.

And, it is probably a good idea if retailers do the same.

Photo credit: Thomas Altfather Good on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

Showrooming, Webrooming, and the New Reality of Omni-Channel Retail

Photo credit: Jason Howie on Flickr.A few years ago, some retail experts speculated that mobile phones and online retailers would put many brick-and-mortar stores out of business.

They thought that these brick-and-mortar stores would become nothing more than showrooms where customers would go to check out and try on merchandise, only to purchase the items online at a better price. Thus, brick-and-mortar stores would become less profitable, forcing some to shutter their doors.

Fast forward a few years and we now know that brick-and-mortar stores are not going anywhere anytime soon. In fact, it is estimated that over 90% of current retail sales still take place in a brick-and-mortar store.

As I have pointed out in the past, Forrester Research predicts that online sales will rise in the next 10 to 15 years to as much as 25 percent of total sales. However, that means 75% of retail sales will still take place in a brick-and-mortar store.

While the prediction of the demise of the brick-and-mortar store was premature, changes in the way that many customers shop often resembles the definition of showrooming, or at least a slight variation of it.

Therefore, even though many sales still take place in a brick-and-mortar store, retailers can’t rest on their laurels.

What Is Showrooming and Webrooming?

According to Wikipedia, “Showrooming is the practice of examining merchandise in a traditional brick-and-mortar retail store or other offline setting, and then buying it online, sometimes at a lower price. Online stores often offer lower prices than their brick-and-mortar counterparts because they do not have the same overhead cost.”

“The reverse phenomenon is webrooming,” says Wikipedia. “In webrooming customers research a product online and buy in a store.”

A Broader Definition of Showrooming

In his book, “Mobile Infuence: The New Power of the Consumer,” Chuck Martin, author and CEO of the Mobile Future Institute, examines showrooming and its effect on retail.

In the book, Martin highlights the results of a 2012 study conducted by ForeSee.

This study provided insights that slightly change the way that we look at showrooming.

“Many retailers that focus on dealing with showrooming, discussed in an earlier chapter, tend to view it as an in-store-only phenomenon,” writes Martin in his book. “A key finding in the ForeSee study is that a large percentage of the mobile usage related to retail is being done at home while preparing to visit a store. This is precisely the pre-buy phase of mobile influence. This means that the actual showrooming may not be as significant in scope at the physical store, since the activity of shopping via mobile is not location-dependent. It can be done anywhere.”

Larry Freed, president and CEO of ForeSee is quoted as saying, “Showrooming is happening, but it’s not happening at breakneck speed. Retailers need to be aware of it but realize it’s just another method of competitiveness.”

In a post on the K3 Retail blog, Chris Donnelly, head of global retail practice at Accenture, is quoted as saying, “The first thing I’d note is that retailers have been showrooms for centuries… If you can’t close the deal when someone is in your store looking to buy, then shame on you. But that aside, what we’re actually finding is that the trend is increasingly the inverse. We call this ‘webrooming’, where a product is researched at home, then consumers go into the store to buy… Yes, online is the side of retail growing the most in the next five years, and we expect 10 to 20 per cent of sales to be online. But that means 80 to 90 per cent are still occurring in-store.”

According to the K3 Retail post, “Research by Accenture found that 73% of shoppers engaged in “showrooming”, while 88% of consumers used “webrooming” as a shopping strategy.”

The New Reality of Omni-Channel Retail

Study after study is proving that customers are researching the products and services that they intend to buy through multiple channels. This includes at a brick-and-mortar store, on a desktop computer, on a smartphone or tablet, via the telephone, in mobile apps, and in any other way imaginable.

And, while most sales are taking place in brick-and-mortar stores, customers do buy products via other shopping channels.

Therefore, because customers can now research products at any time that is convenient to them and are using multiple channels to do it, every transaction that includes an interaction with the customer in a brick-and-mortar store and an online or mobile store has the potential to be classified as an instance of showrooming or webrooming. The only difference is when and if the retailer closes the sale.

To complicate this further, a customer in a brick-and-mortar store could check out merchandise at one brick-and-mortar store, research prices online, and then go to another brick-and-mortar store to buy the item because the other store is selling the product for less.

Is this showrooming? It could be classified that way.

However, who really cares about how we label it?

The reality is that retailers shouldn’t care if their customers buy from them in a brick-and-mortar store or if they buy from them online. What they need to worry about is whether or not customers are buying from them or if they are buying from the competition.

Therefore, they should be making sure that they are offering the best possible shopping experience to their customers at every touch point and giving them the ability to purchase the product quickly and conveniently from wherever and whenever the customer wants to.

Final Thoughts

Retailers should be worried about showrooming and webrooming.

But, not because they care about how the customer is buying from them.

It shouldn’t be a battle between brick-and-mortar stores and online retailers. The real competition is the other retailer, not the medium or channel that customers are using to interact with the store.

As Brian Eisenberg, chief marketing officer at IdealSpot, is quoted as saying in an Click Z article, “Retail doesn’t exist without an online component and online retail isn’t as cost-effective if you don’t have a brick-and-mortar component. We’re connected all the time through the phones in our pockets, but we live in a physical world.”

Therefore, retailers should offer customers a consistent and seamless shopping experience across all shopping channels, from the brick-and-mortar store to the online and mobile store and everything in-between.

They need to optimize for conversion and customer experience in every channel so that the store is the best place to shop no matter how or when the customer wants to.

By focusing on what customers need and creating a better shopping experience than the competition everywhere customers shop will eliminate the need to worry about showrooming, webrooming, or whatever you want to call it.

Photo credit: Jason Howie on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

Luxury Shopping Bags: Status Symbols and Social Media Props

Photo credit: Sofy Marquez on Flickr.People love to shop and they love to let people know about it.

Therefore, it’s not surprising that for many years luxury retailers have given their customers the ability to let their friends, neighbors, and just about anyone else know that they have just spent some of their hard-earned money by providing trendy shopping bags to carry proudly as they walk through a busy mall or city street.

As Maggie Lange pointed out in a 2013 article on The Cut, “The shopping bag isn’t just utilitarian, it’s symbolic of taste, preferences, and pursuits. In his book Living It Up, author James Twitchell compares people holding shopping bags to “the powder on the heinies of migrating bees as they moved from hive to hive.” It’s a souvenir of where you went and a glossy declaration of conspicuous consumption.”

With the rise of image-driven social networking sites like Instagram and Pinterest, the design of these shopping bags might be more important than ever before.

The Shopping Bag Should Reflect the Brand’s Image

In a 2011 Luxury Daily post, Kayla Hutzler highlights the fact that luxury shopping bags are visible to many consumers and therefore should positively convey the image and feel of the brand.

As Chris Turbyfill, executive vice president of sales and marketing at Design Packaging, is quoted as saying, “That bag reminds consumers of the brand and [therefore] it should look like the store. It is all involved in what we call the customer experience.”

“That bag needs to reflect the imagery and feel of the brand,” says Turbyfill. “And when consumers go home and put the bag on the table, it is a subtle reminder of what happened in the store.”

The post goes on to point out that the shopping bag can be seen by many people as customers walk around in public, particularly in major metropolises.

However, the post doesn’t mention another role that the shopping bag can play.

Use the Shopping Bag to Get Included

As Juliet Carnoy, Marketing Manager at Pixlee, writes in a post on the Pixlee blog, “Customer photos of your products are the purest form of earned media. When a customer posts a post-purchase photo of your product on social media, it’s a 5-star visual review of your brand.

For the brands that make the products, this is great.

However, the retailer that sold the products might get left out if they don’t give the customer some way to visually represent the store in the photo. This is where a visually appealing shopping bag can play the role of photo prop and help get the retailer included in the story.

In some cases, if the shopping bag is really visually appealing or is a part of pop culture, customers will post photos of the shopping bag alone just to commemorate the shopping experience.

When a photo of the shopping bag is posted on social networking sites, it will not only be seen by all the people that that customer passes on the way home from the store, it could potentially be seen by thousands of people online.

A photo posted by Chad Thiele (@chadjthiele) on

Personal Case Study

One of the best ways to explain something is to give an example. And, what a better way than to give an example from my own personal experience.

About two weeks ago, I visited the local Verizon Wireless store with the intent of renewing my contract and purchasing a new smartphone.

The phone that I was looking for was actually sold out at the local store. Instead of waiting for the next shipment, I drove to the nearest store that had one available.

The customer service at both Verizon Wireless stores that I visited was excellent, and I walked out of the second store with a new Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge.

In keeping with the current trend, I prepared to take a photo of my purchase so that I could post it on Instagram.

This could have just been a photo of my new smartphone.

However, Verizon Wireless had just given me this beautiful shopping bag with the purchase that just begged to be included in the photo. So, I did just that.

After posting the photo, the marketer in me realized that by giving me the shopping bag, Verizon Wireless had found a way get included in what would have been user-generated content that advertised Samsung. By adding the shopping bag, it made it a user-generated ad for both Verizon Wireless and Samsung, if not primarily Verizon Wireless.

In my opinion, that was brilliant.

If only they had included a hashtag on the shopping bag, it would have been perfect. This not only would have encouraged customers to take photos of the shopping bag, but it would have also helped customers connect with other customers, brand advocates, and the brand.

Final Thoughts

Sometimes, it is the smallest details that can help get customers to mention and indirectly endorse brands on social networking sites.

And, as study after study has shown, consumers trust recommendations from people they know more than other traditional advertising methods that brands have relied on in the past.

By offering customers trendy shopping bags that properly reflect the brand’s image, retailers can now be included in the post-purchase photos that customers upload to social networking sites after a long day of shopping.

Photo credit: Sofy Marquez on Flickr and @chadjthiele on Instagram.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

Brands and Retailers Need to Integrate Social Media into the Offline Shopping Experience

Photo credit: Annie Mole on Flickr.Many brands and retailers are using social media to advertise and build relationships with customers online.

However, if these businesses fail to integrate social media into the shopping experience at brick-and-mortar stores, they are missing out on a huge opportunity.

A Majority of U.S. Consumers Have a Smartphone

According to comScore, “198.5 million people in the U.S. owned smartphones (79.1 percent mobile market penetration) during the three months ending in January.”

To put this into perspective, the U.S. Census Bureau estimates that 322.9 million people lived in the U.S. at the end of January of 2016. That means approximately 61.5% of the U.S. population owned a smartphone.

What this also means is that there is a good chance that many of your customers and prospects not only own a smartphone, but are using it to make purchase decisions.

In his book, titled “Mobile Influence: The New Power of the Consumer,” Chuck Martin, author and CEO of the Mobile Future Institute, points out that there are six influence points in the mobile shopping life cycle. These include: The Setup: The Pre-Buy, The Move: In Transit, The Push: On Location, The Play: Selection Process, The Wrap: Point of Purchase, and The Takeaway: Post-Purchase.

At each stage in the mobile shopping life cycle, brands and retailers are given the opportunity to convince a consumer to buy their product or service. In his book, Chuck Martin devotes a chapter to each of these points of influence.

As he points out, there are many tools in a marketer’s toolbox to help influence a sale by leveraging the power of the mobile phone.

This includes, but is not limited to, the use of social networking sites to connect with consumers as they research, buy, and share the love of a brand online.

Given that many online interactions can now happen when the consumer is physically located in a brick-and-mortar store, it only makes sense that brands and retailers should look for additional ways to interact with customers as they are making purchase decisions and influencing the purchase decisions of other consumers who they interact with online.

Consumers Are Using Social Networking Sites

As mentioned, a majority of U.S. consumers own a smartphone.

Furthermore, according to a study conducted by the Pew Research Center, in 2014 75% of smartphone owners used their phones to access social networking sites.

And, this is just the percentage of people who used social media on a smartphone.

When you consider the fact that even people who don’t use social networking sites on a smartphone could be connected to someone who does, I would venture a guess that nearly everyone who uses social media could potentially be influenced by an interaction that a consumer has with a brand while the consumer is in a brick-and-mortar store.

Final Thoughts

The number of people who use social networking sites continues to increase, as does the number who own smartphones.

While many brands and retailers currently use social media to advertise and build relationships with customers and prospects online, if they don’t integrate social media into the offline shopping experience at brick-and-mortar stores they could be missing out on a huge opportunity to reach and engage with customers at each of the influence points in the mobile shopping life cycle that Chuck Martin describes in his book.

Photo credit: Annie Mole on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

Your Customers Want a Better Mobile Shopping Experience

Photo credit: gail on Flickr.

It should now be clear that mobile devices are going to play a huge role in how customers research, search for, and buy products for the foreseeable future. This is a fact that we have known for a few years now.

However, while more businesses are starting to make investments in mobile, several studies have made it abundantly clear that we are a long way from getting it right.

Part of the issue is the complexity of the shopping experience and the role that mobile devices currently play.

In order to get mobile marketing right you need to think about a lot of things, many that extend beyond the mobile device itself.

Many marketers are still trying to use their traditional ways of advertising to people without taking into account what is happening all around consumers as they interact with the brand on their mobile devices while out and about in the offline world.

Therefore, it’s not surprising that many businesses haven’t had much luck with their mobile marketing efforts.

In fact, according to the recent “CMO Survey Report” sponsored by Deloitte, the American Marketing Association, and The Fuqua School of Business at Duke University, most responding CMOs do not feel that mobile marketing currently makes a substantial contribution to their company’s bottom line. In fact, 40% said that mobile marketing makes no contribution at all. (Note: I would argue that measurement is partially to blame for these responses.)

As time goes on, brands and retailers will start to listen to customers and give them more of what they want and need. When this happens, we will not only see more happy customers, but a better return on investment for the businesses that use mobile devices to properly communicate with their customers and prospects while they are interacting with the brand in other ways.

Why Customers Don’t Shop on Mobile Devices

As I have pointed out in the last few posts, most retail transactions still take place in a brick-and-mortar store and about two-thirds of e-commerce transactions still take place on a desktop.

A recent GfK study that was commissioned by Facebook IQ has some insights into why omni-channel shoppers (those that research and bought items via a variety of channels including smartphones, tablets, desktop computers, and in brick-and-mortar stores) aren’t currently shopping on their mobile devices.

When omni-channel shoppers were asked why they shopped on a desktop vs. a mobile device, 56% said that it is easier to see all the available products on a desktop, 55% find it easier to use devices with bigger screens, 27% said that they find it difficult to compare products and retailers via a smartphone or tablet, and 26% said entering personal data is not very user friendly on a smartphone or tablet.

All these responses indicate that brands and retailers need to improve the User Experience (UX) of their mobile apps and websites. Even the responses that have to do with the size of the screen can be improved with better design.

When looking at why omni-channel shoppers chose to shop in a brick-and-mortar store vs. mobile, 47% said they like to touch and feel the products, 46% said that they don’t want to wait, 41% said that the shipping costs too much, and 25% said that in-store shopping is relaxing/enjoyable.

Two of the issues here can be fixed with shortening the time it takes to ship the product and by offering reduced-priced or free shipping to customers.

However, the other two issues really aren’t issues at all. They are actually opportunities that brands and retailers can take advantage of.

Thinking About the Whole Customer Shopping Experience—Both Online and Offline

As mentioned in the past, Forrester Research estimates that 49 percent of total sales in 2016 will be influenced by online interactions.

Many of these interactions will happen on a mobile device when a customer is in your store.

Brands and retailers need to be thinking about everything that a consumer wants and needs when they are making a decision to buy a product or service. This includes the interactions that consumers are having with your brand offline and via a mobile device. Each of these can reinforce the other and make them more effective than they would be alone.

In a recent post on the iMedia Connections blog, Jeff Hasen, Mobile Strategist and Founder of Gotta Mobilize, highlights the fact that businesses haven’t caught up with the times.

In the post, Jeff Hasen quotes Martin Sorrell, chief executive of the advertising group WPP.

“The essential problem is that big companies are not thinking about mobile in the right way,” Sorrell is quoted as saying. “They’re thinking of it as an extension of digital, just a way to reach consumers. They’re not thinking of it in a way that changes their businesses or adds values in a way they weren’t able to do previously.”

Final Thoughts

Mobile devices are changing the way that consumers live their lives. This includes the way that they shop for products and services.

This is something that experts will be talking about for a long time. And, for good reason.

Businesses need to adapt to these changes. Those that do it first will succeed. Those that don’t will be forced to follow, because their customers and prospects will demand it.

Photo credit: gail on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

More Evidence That Smartphones Are Key to Success in an Omnichannel Retail World

Photo credit: Sharon Hahn Darlin on Flickr.The role that mobile devices play in retail continues to grow. Not only are consumers using mobile devices to research products and get recommendations, a growing number of transactions are being completed on mobile.

According to a recent press release, Criteo’s “Q4 2015 State of Mobile Commerce Report” found that about four in 10 online transactions in the United States occur across multiple devices or channels. Furthermore, close to one-third of e-commerce transactions actually are completed on a mobile device.

This is particularly important given the fact that according to the U.S. Census Bureau, “E-commerce sales in the fourth quarter of 2015 accounted for 7.5 percent of total sales.” And, as I pointed out in the last post, Forrester Research predicts that within the next 10 to 15 years, e-commerce could account for as much as 25 percent of total sales.

Moreover, as alluded to above, mobile devices are impacting offline sales as well, as consumers use their smartphones and tablets to research and get recommendations about products online before or even during a shopping trip at a brick-and-mortar store.

Mobile Influences the Offline Transaction

As a recent article on the Mobile Commerce Daily website points out, “More than $1 trillion of total retail sales in 2015 were influenced by mobile phones, with most of this coming from in-store transactions and further growth expected, according to a new report from Forrester Research.”

The article goes on to point out that Forrester Research expects web-influenced sales with grow to $1.3 trillion in 2016 and reach $1.6 trillion by 2020. To put it a different way, web-influenced sales will account for 49 percent of the total sales in 2016 and reach 55 percent of total sales by 2020.

The article also points out that this trend is being fueled by larger smartphones and faster wireless networks. Furthermore, the fact that search engines are providing ways for consumers to find the information that they need quickly via their smartphones is also a factor.

It’s not surprising that more retailers and brands are looking for ways to advertise and engage with consumers on their mobile devices. Those that don’t are going to be left behind.

A Majority of Mobile Transactions Are Conducted Via a Smartphone

As I already pointed out, most retail sales still take place offline.

However, the percentage of sales conducted online continues to grow, with nearly a third of these online transactions actually taking place via a mobile device.

According to the Criteo report mentioned earlier, 60 percent of sales that take place on mobile devices are completed via a smartphone.

It is important to note that tablets drove higher value sales than smartphones.

However, 43 percent of tablet shoppers used multiple devices in their shopping journey. This means that in addition to the desktop, smartphones are important even when the final sale is conducted via a tablet.

Final Thoughts

In an omnichannel retail world, the path to purchase can take many twists and turns along the way.

A consumer could research, check for product reviews and recommendations, and purchase a product after interacting with the brand and/or retailer online via a desktop computer, tablet, smartphone, and/or offline at a brick-and-mortar store or kiosk.

Therefore, it is important to give consumers the information that they need when and how they want it and allow them to purchase from you when and how they want to.

As mentioned, the offline store is still going to be the most common way for consumers to purchase products for the foreseeable future. However, as this post points out, the smartphone is going to play an ever-increasing role in determining what will be purchased and where that sale will take place.

Photo credit: Sharon Hahn Darlin on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

In an Omnichannel Retail World, It’s “Bricks” AND “Clicks”

Photo credit: Bell Ella Boutique on Flickr.In recent years, e-commerce retail sales have grown at a faster rate than sales in the more traditional “brick and mortar” locations, but it would be a mistake to think that “brick and mortar” stores are going to go the way of the Dodo bird.

As a CBS news article pointed out in November of last year, “Online sales claimed 7.4 percent of the retail dollar in the third quarter, up from 2.8 percent 10 years ago, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. E-commerce, which accounted for $87.5 billion in the September-ending quarter, was ahead 15 percent over the same period in 2014. Brick-and-mortar retailing nudged up just 0.6 percent, year over year.”

The same article points out that Amazon is seeing healthy growth while sales at more traditional merchants are remaining stagnant or losing ground.

The author of the article continues, “Forrester Research predicts that online retailing will reach a natural peak within the next 10 to 15 years, reaching as much as 25 percent of total sales.”

However, if you reflect on this statistic for a while, the logical conclusion is that even though e-commerce sales are going to take a larger piece of the pie, approximately 75 percent of sales will still happen in the “brick and mortar” store.

This is general point that the author of the CBS article is trying to make.

In fact, many retail experts have been pointing out how important the “brick and mortar” store is to the future of retail.

That said, traditional retailers can’t rest on their laurels. The path to conversion going forward is not going to be the same as it was in the past.

Consumers Use Online and Mobile to Get Ideas, Research Products, and Purchase Items

While the Internet is only a few decades old, smart marketers have found ways to measure and optimize the online conversion process.

However, by giving consumers the ability to quickly get ideas and research and compare products, what consumers do online can also have an effect on offline sales.

This has become an even bigger issue given the fact that many consumers now have a smartphone with them, giving them the ability to browse, research, and compare products even as they view the items in real life in “brick and mortar” stores.

Therefore, when looking at the big picture, what a consumer sees online can and will impact online and offline sales.

With this in mind, Google and other businesses are working hard to help retailers and brands increase sales by driving customers to their online and offline stores.

In order to optimize these efforts, retailers need to be able to measure what effect online marketing has on offline sales. While the process isn’t perfect yet, Google is trying to provide a solution to this problem, as well.

Final Thoughts

In today’s world, retailers and brands shouldn’t choose to market and sell their products online or offline.

The way to success will be using tactics that give customers the information that they need when and where they need it and the ability to buy the products when and how they want to.

Therefore, the correct choice is actually marketing and selling products online and offline.

Photo credit: Bell Ella Boutique on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

Why Brands Shouldn’t Wait to Invest in Mobile Marketing

Photo credit: Audio-Technica on Flickr.If your brand hasn’t allocated at least some of its marketing budget to mobile, it is missing out on a huge opportunity.

Even brands that have taken a wait and see approach to mobile marketing are starting to see the value that mobile brings to the table.

In fact, according to a recent eMarketer article, this year more businesses are planning to invest in mobile advertising than ever before.

However, it’s not that businesses will be spending significantly less to reach consumers on their desktops. In fact, while the amount spent this year on ads targeting users on desktops is projected to be slightly less than it was in 2015, eMarketer is reporting that this number should rebound in the next few years.

That said, the amount of money budgeted for mobile advertising is projected to skyrocket.

And, it’s not surprising given the fact that according to an article published on Forbes.com in August of 2015, a majority of online content is now consumed on mobile devices.

This same article also pointed out that mobile ads have reach, as most U.S. adults currently have mobile phones and/or tablets.

Not only that, people are three times more likely to open a mobile ad than a desktop ad.

Furthermore, mobile ads are “ridiculously cheap.”

According to the Forbes.com article, “Mobile brands have underinvested in this area, and prices haven’t caught up yet. Compared to the cost of traditional advertising streams, mobile ads are a bargain. TV and print ads’ CPM is $100, while online CPM hovers around $3.50. Mobile CPM, on the other hand, can be as low as 75 cents.”

Final Thoughts

Mobile ads are currently more likely to be opened than ads targeting consumers on their desktops.

And, mobile ads are currently relatively inexpensive, when compared to ads targeting consumers via other marketing channels (e.g., television, print, desktop, etc.)

That said, this is likely to change as more businesses start to target consumers on their mobile devices.

The increased competition is likely to drive the costs up. And, if consumers get bombarded with ads on mobile devices, the open rates are probably going to decrease somewhat.

This is not to say that mobile will lose its value—the fact that so many people consume content on mobile devices, combined with the added ability to target customers and prospects when they are most likely to purchase your product or service is what makes mobile advertising so desirable.

With the right planning, mobile advertising is going to continue to be a very effective way to reach consumers.

However, it doesn’t pay to wait.

Brands that are currently using mobile are not only benefiting from less competition, they are also learning what works and what doesn’t.

This will give these brands the knowledge to succeed when the level of competition increases.

Photo credit: Audio-Technica on Flickr.

Chad Thiele

Marketing analyst and strategist, content curator, applied sociologist, proud UW-Madison alumnus, and an Auburn-trained mobile marketer. My goal is to help businesses identify trends that will help them achieve their marketing objectives and business goals. I'm currently looking for my next career challenge. Please feel free to contact me anytime at: chadjthiele@gmail.com.

More Posts

Copyright © chadjthiele.com
Every interaction with a consumer IS marketing.

Built on Notes Blog Core
Powered by WordPress